Basel Competition Recap
Published on 2 May 2011 in ResultsThroughout the meet, I kept thinking about my post from last week about some simple steps that meets can take to make the hammer throw more attractive to fans and athletes. I don’t like competing in the typical Swiss meets because they too often ignore what is best for both the fans and athletes. Chiefly, they seems not to know the concept of flights. Whether there are 3 or 30 athletes, they all compete together in one group. Sunday’s competition had 23 athletes throwing together, including junior, open, and masters throwers. Nearly 2.5 hours passed between my first warm up throw and my final attempt of the competition. With already tired legs, the snail’s pace of the competition did little to help me.
I spoke to the meet director today about this and he explained that in previous years there were few entrants, so the slow competition was as much of a surprise to him as it was to me. He will try to make sure this doesn’t happen in the future, and it should be easy to fix: just split up the men and women. But Basel is not the only competition where this happens. It has happened even at bigger meets like the Swiss Club Championships. The Swiss are known for efficiency, but it doesn’t always work. Fans are not going to want to stick around for such a competition even when that meet can be as interesting as the club championships.
This is one area where the U.S. has a leg up. Nearly every U.S. meet follows the USATF suggestion in Rule 180(7): “When there are more than 15 competitors in a field event and the time available for the meet makes the holding of a qualifying competition impractical … the first three rounds may be conducted in flights.” A simple recommendation like that would do a world of wonders for hammer throwers and fans here in Switzerland.








